Call us:  0800 0 224 224

Our claims services

Contact us today

Call us free on

0800 0 224 224

Email us at

enquiries@thompsons.law

Contact one of our offices

Find your local office

Employment Law Review

Thompsons’ Employment Law Review is recognised as an authoritative source of comment and discussion from our trade union law specialists. Available to read here, and also via a weekly email bulletin, the Employment Law Review offers considerable insight into the latest issues affecting trade unions and their members.

 

Filter Articles By:

Latest Issues

Weekly Issue 879

  • Government Updates Employment Rights Bill Amendment Paper
  • Case Summary: Roofe-Stewart v MacIntyre Care Ltd – Disability Discrimination Appeal
  • Case Summary: Dr Mark Ter-Berg v Mr Parul Malde & Dr Colin Hancock – Worker Status Appeal

Weekly Issue 878

  • TUC and Hope Not Hate research reports strong public support for Employment Rights Bill
  • Case Study: Higgs v Farmor’s School
  • Case Study: Marston (Holdings) Ltd v A Perkins [2025] EAT 20

Weekly Issue 877

  • New Guidance Issued on Taking Oral Evidence from Overseas Witnesses
  • TUC Highlights Zero-Hours Contract Crisis as Workers Remain Stuck in Insecurity
  • Eddie Stobart Ltd v Miss Caitlin Graham [2025] EAT 14

Employment rights

Weekly Issue 879

Government Updates Employment Rights Bill Amendment Paper

Major updates to the Employment Rights Bill introduce new rules on agency work, redundancies, and wage enforcement—discover how these changes could impact you.

Equality, discrimination and harassment

Weekly Issue 879

Case Summary: Roofe-Stewart v MacIntyre Care Ltd – Disability Discrimination Appeal

A crucial EAT decision reinstates a disability discrimination claim, highlighting the legal test for recurring impairments under the Equality Act—discover the implications for workers and tribunals.

Definition of a worker

Weekly Issue 879

Case Summary: Dr Mark Ter-Berg v Mr Parul Malde & Dr Colin Hancock – Worker Status Appeal

A landmark EAT decision overturns a tribunal ruling on worker status, clarifying legal tests for personal service, control, and economic dependency—find out its implications.

Equal pay

Weekly Issue 879

Case Summary: Tesco Stores Ltd v Ms K Element & Ors – Equal Pay and Expert Evidence Appeal

A major ruling in Tesco’s equal pay case sees the tribunal reconsider expert economic evidence—discover the implications for pay equality and employment law.

Employment rights

Weekly Issue 878

TUC and Hope Not Hate research reports strong public support for Employment Rights Bill

New polling shows overwhelming public support for the Employment Rights Bill, with voters across all parties backing stronger worker protections, including banning zero-hours contracts, improving sick pay, and strengthening unfair dismissal laws.

Disciplinary and dismissal

Weekly Issue 878

Case Study: Higgs v Farmor’s School

The Court of Appeal ruled that Kristie Higgs’ dismissal for expressing gender-critical beliefs on Facebook was discriminatory, reinforcing key protections for freedom of expression in UK employment law.

Redundancy and Protective Awards

Weekly Issue 878

Case Study: Marston (Holdings) Ltd v A Perkins [2025] EAT 20

The Employment Appeal Tribunal overturned a ruling of indirect sex discrimination and unfair dismissal in Perkins v. Marston, emphasizing the need for clear evidence in discrimination claims and genuine redundancy processes.

Employment tribunals and tribunal fees

Weekly Issue 877

New Guidance Issued on Taking Oral Evidence from Overseas Witnesses

New UK tribunal guidance outlines key steps for taking oral evidence from overseas witnesses—learn how to avoid legal obstacles, delays, and potential sanctions.

Zero hours contracts

Weekly Issue 877

TUC Highlights Zero-Hours Contract Crisis as Workers Remain Stuck in Insecurity

Over 1 million UK workers are on zero-hours contracts, facing job insecurity and low pay—discover how the new Employment Rights Bill aims to strengthen worker protections.

Redundancy and Protective Awards

Weekly Issue 877

Eddie Stobart Ltd v Miss Caitlin Graham [2025] EAT 14

The EAT reduced a £10,000 maternity discrimination award to £2,000, citing limited evidence of harm—learn the key takeaways for employers and union representatives.

Disciplinary and dismissal

Weekly Issue 877

Ms Carol McMahon v AXA ICAS Ltd [2025] EAT 8

The EAT ruled on employer obligations under PHI schemes, wage deductions after dismissal, and the handling of delayed disability discrimination claims—key insights for workers and employers.

Maternity/Parental rights

Weekly Issue 876

New Neonatal Care Leave and Pay: Support for Parents from Day One

From April 2025, working parents can take up to 12 weeks of paid neonatal care leave, ensuring they can stay with their baby without risking their job or income. Find out who qualifies and how it works.