This ruling emphasises the importance of clearly defining waived claims in settlement agreements. For union representatives, this case underscores the necessity of detailed legal advice before members sign agreements, especially regarding future claims.
The Court of Appeal confirmed that discrimination claims related to pay disparities cannot be brought against the principal (The Royal Parks Ltd) but must be directed at the direct employer (the contractor). This ruling highlights the need for union representatives to guide members accurately in identifying the responsible party for such claims.
The EAT’s decision highlights the importance of presenting comprehensive claims and considering continuing acts of discrimination. Union representatives must ensure all relevant claims are articulated clearly and within time limits.